Mushroom Management:
Don’t Keep Your Workforce in the Dark
Today’s businesses must change course quickly. Communication and
information are essential to innovation, good customer service, high
retention, and change. And it has to flow freely.
In a survey my organization
conducted, respondents where asked this question. "To improve your
workplace environment what would you like to see your
executives/supervisors/managers do?"
69% of the respondents said be "Better at communicating."
You’d think that with so many ways to communicate—cell phones,
Internet, E-mail, personal digital assistants, pagers, etc—our ability to
communicate would improve. But the opposite seems to be true: as
technology advances, the quality of communication declines. Put another
way, as the quantity of communication tools increases, the quality of
communication decreases.
In 1995, the Boeing Company suffered its second-longest walkout ever
when the Machinists Union led a 69-day strike against the company. Boeing
lost hundreds of millions of dollars and experienced big customer service
headaches when the company missed the delivery dates on 36 airliners.
Part of the problem was that while Boeing "preached" teamwork and
productivity, it sent jobs out to lower-cost subcontractors. This
disconnect between what management was saying and doing escalated tensions
between the union and management.
Boeing’s Chairman and President blamed the strike on its "own lack of
understanding of worker sentiment and on a failure to communicate
corporate concerns to the work force." He noted that part of the problem
lay with Boeing’s "inability to communicate effectively on what we were
about and why we were about it."
In 1998 UPS suffered a similar fate when its employees went on strike.
UPS lost over $700 million in revenues and a blow to its credibility and
trust among its loyal employees. In retrospect, the Atlanta Human
Resources Director, said, "No one won." He noted that the walkout could
have been prevented if UPS had done a better job of communication prior to
and during the negotiations.
UPS learned two important lessons from the strike. First, the employees
did not fully understand their benefit packages prior to the strike. If
they had understood them, much of the confusion could have been
eliminated. The final settlement between the union and management did not
significantly increase benefits over the previous contract.
Second, UPS underestimated the need to communicate during the actual
negotiation process. To avoid confusing people during the rapidly shifting
negotiations, it kept a tight rein on information—a major mistake, as it
turned out. Employees wanted to know what was going on, and because they
couldn’t, many loyal employees felt betrayed by management and walked off
the job. The lack of information created a backlash and anger, resentment,
legal actions, and lost revenues.
Finally, UPS learned never to assume that your people know what you
think they know. When in doubt, over communicate!
Low-Access and High-Access Organizations
There are two basic types of organizations: low-access and high-access.
Good communication is a hallmark of the high-retention work environment.
At its heart, communication is all about access.
In a low-access organization, the flow of communication is guarded and
restricted—constipated, in fact. People find themselves kept in the dark,
like mushrooms, stuffed in narrow confines based on job descriptions,
ranking, and where they sit on the organizational chart. It’s no surprise
that low-access organizations—many of them hierarchical—have greater
difficulty responding to change, fluctuating customer needs, and the
fluidity of the modern workplace.
In contrast, a high-access organization thrives on information and
shares it to the maximum extent possible. The more information people
have, the more quickly they can respond to the changing needs of customers
and the environment. High-access companies are committed to open
communication.
Symptoms of the Low-Access Organization
- It’s a regulatory-based culture, not a people-based culture. A
low-access organization is structured around rules, regulations and
policies. Management places more emphasis on enforcing rules than
eliminating unnecessary rules and regulations.
- Decision making is centralized. The low-access organization has a
top-down decision making process.
- Mistakes are hard to fix. The low-access organization has a reward
system that minimizes change and initiative. Because only the people on
top of the organization are responsible for interpreting and approving
any changes to regulations, decision-making slows down because the
responsibility and power to make decisions is taken away from those who
need it the most.
- Change is resisted. A low-access organization protects itself from
change. Only a disaster, a threat, or a public relations crisis is
enough to initiate change. In the compartmentalized, functionally
aligned, department-by-department organization, there is an expert for
everything.
- The pecking order is defined. In its worst form, a low-access
organization becomes a caste system. Top-down layering dictates what
roles to take, whom to talk to, and who to associate with. Rank,
position and educational degrees become more important than results.
Free newsletter: If you would like more tips, advice and a free
subscription to the Navigator newsletter please send
click here.
Gregory P. Smith shows businesses how to build productive and
profitable work environments that attract, keep and motivate their
workforce. He is the author of the book,
Here Today Here Tomorrow:
Transforming Your Workforce from High-Turnover to High-Retention.
He speaks at conferences, conducts management training and is the
President of a management consulting firm called Chart Your Course
International located in Conyers, Georgia. Phone him at 770-860-9464. More
articles available:
http://www.chartcourse.com
|
You also might be interested in . .
. |
|
|
|
|

Fired Up!
Leading Your Organization to Achieve Exceptional Results
More Information
|

401 Proven Ways
To Retain Your Best Employees
More Information
|

TNT for Teams:
Dynamic Ways to
Reward, Energize & Motivate Your Teams
More Information
|

Best Selling Icebreakers
and Team Building
Exercises
More Information |
 |
 |
 |
 |